EKÁ PRESENTS ITS EASY-BREEZY SPRING-SUMMER COLLECTION, KOHIMA

Last Saturday, the chic market of Lodhi...

CEC snubs those doubting EVMs

‘While you fail to prove yourself, you...

Protection of minorities is no crime

It was decades ago when this columnist...

GST taking shape, but irritants remain

BusinessGST taking shape, but irritants remain
After reaching consensus on having a four-tier tax structure under the new Goods & Services Tax (GST) regime, the GST council — representing interests of central and state governments — failed to reach a crucial agreement over “who would assess whom”, as Finance minister Arun Jaitley puts it. Ideally, there should be one assessing authority for one tax payer, suggested Jaitley who remains confident on reaching a political consensus on the issue of dual control by 20th of this month.  “Having a single authority to manage the new taxation regime would create less of confusion and more of cooperation from the trading community,” feels B.C. Bhartia, president, Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT).

 Earlier in the week, the GST council headed by Jaitley decided in favour of having four tax slabs to be  applicable by April next year. Barring essential food items which would be taxed at zero rate, all other goods and services would be taxed at 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% with the lowest tax for commonly used goods and the highest for the consumption of luxuries (yet to be defined fully). The broad classification ends here and the decision to classify individual items under a particular tax bracket would be decided later. Such postponement has made industries, ranging from gold to automobiles, quite anxious. From the point of view of traders, it is more important to know this classification as soon as possible to know the taxation impact on their respective industries, feels CAIT.

The GST council headed by Jaitley decided in favour of having four tax slabs to be  applicable by April next year

Besides the highest tax imposed on luxury consumption (highly prices cars, tobacco, aerated drinks and pan masala), an additional cess would also be imposed which would be used for compensating states for any shortfall in their revenues that might arise on account of implementing GST. The said cess and the compensation to states would, however, lapse after five years. Many analysts feel that such a cess goes against the spirit of nationwide single tax called GST and might carry on the cascading tax culture.

Moreover, the number of tax returns per year (about 36 proposed under GST) that the trader would be filing is going to make matters quite complicated, especially for small and medium enterprises. Since GST is a new tax with an inbuilt requirement of e-compliance, it is all the more necessary to equip the traders and other verticals of the non-corporate sector with adequate knowledge about the procedures and compliance formalities under GST. “It is advisable to either make provisions for quarterly returns or give them sufficient transition time to understand the new regime,” feels Bimal Jain, taxation expert at A2Z Taxcorp LLP. Like officials’ training, the traders should also be trained for easy compliance of GST.

 

- Advertisement -

Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles