Gandhi, Chakrayya and Ambedkar

Gandhi, Chakrayya and Ambedkar

By M.J. Akbar | 16 April, 2016
‘I would wish with all my heart to have a brave, selfless and pure-hearted Dalit girl to be our first President. It is no vain dream,’ Gandhi suggested.

​In May 1947, Mahatma Gandhi suffered a grievous personal loss. Chakrayya, a young Dalit disciple who had served at Sevagram Ashram since its inception in 1935, died of brain tumour. He was like family; the Mahatma’s grief was palpable and public.

On 2 June Gandhi startled his prayer meeting with a radical suggestion. He first explained his decision to name Jawaharlal Nehru as the “uncrowned king of India”: having studied at Harrow and Cambridge before becoming barrister, Nehru was needed to negotiate with Englishmen. It was not the most persuasive of arguments, but Gandhi wanted to convey that Nehru’s role as free India’s first Prime Minister was not in question. But there was a second post, technically higher in than a Prime Minister’s in the new Indian polity, that was vacant.

I quote: “But the time is fast approaching when India will have to elect the first President of the Republic. I would have proposed the name of Chakrayya, had he been alive. I would wish with all my heart to have a brave, selfless and pure-hearted Dalit [the term Gandhi used, now obsolete, has been changed here and elsewhere] girl to be our first President. It is no vain dream...Our future President will have no need to know English. Of course he will be assisted by men who are proficient in political matters and who also know foreign languages. These dreams, however, can be realised only if we devote all our attention to our villages instead of killing each other” [Collected Works, Volume 95].

On 6 June, Gandhi pursued this idea in a conversation with Rajendra Prasad, who would of course become India’s first President. Gandhi framed his proposal thus: “If all the leaders join the Cabinet, it will be very difficult to maintain contact with the people at large...That is why I suggested even in my prayer speech that a Dalit like Chakrayya or a Dalit girl should be made the nation’s first President and Jawaharlal should become the Prime Minister...” Since Chakrayya had died a young Dalit woman could be given the honour.

Congress leaders were unimpressed. It is interesting that Chakrayya is never mentioned by any of them in their memoirs or records of their conversations, at least to my knowledge. Perhaps they dismissed the thought as the radicalism of a saint, increasingly removed from practical requirements of office. But Gandhi continued to campaign for such empowerment, saying things like “We want the rule of the Dalits. The Dalits are the highest of all because their service is the greatest.” Interestingly, neither Gandhi nor those Congress leaders preparing to enter office thought that Babasaheb Ambedkar might be worth consideration as the first Rashtrapati.

Ambedkar laid down his famous dictum: there are no rights without remedies, which became the operating principle of the Constitution. Gandhi did not live long enough to see the Constitution, but he understood the power of political symbolism. Nothing would erode the psychological foundations of caste hierarchies faster than a Dalit in the palace of Viceroys.

Ambedkar certainly had the qualifications and repute. It is likely that Babasaheb’s decision to play an independent role during the independence movement rankled deeply with contemporary Congress leaders. Babasaheb was not one of them. They refused to trust him beyond a point.

The challenge of Dalit empowerment was of highest concern to both Gandhi and Ambedkar, with this difference that Gandhi gave first priority to freedom and Ambedkar to Dalit emancipation. By the mid-1940s, the difference became irrelevant, as freedom became visible. The thrust of Ambedkar’s intellectual contribution shifted to careful proposals that could fashion a polity acceptable to both Hindus and Muslims. He also pondered deeply on the meaning of partition. As early as in December 1940 he published what is surely the first book with a title that includes “Pakistan”. His Thoughts on Pakistan was startling and prescient. No one else had foreseen what is today’s biggest threat, an Islamic Jihad with a geo-political agenda rising from the North-West Frontier and Afghanistan. Ambedkar’s thesis, that “a safe army is better than a safe border”, is remarkable.

Once Pakistan became a fact, the focus shifted to internal challenges. The curse of an abominable caste system could be abolished in law, but its elimination in real life was a different story. Ambedkar laid down his famous dictum: there are no rights without remedies, which became the operating principle of the Constitution. Gandhi did not live long enough to see the Constitution, but he understood the power of political symbolism. Nothing would erode the psychological foundations of caste hierarchies faster than a Dalit in the palace of Viceroys.

It took us decades to fulfil Gandhi’s dream.To be fair, we have come a very long way since 1947, but there are, as famously noted by a poet, miles to go. Leaders are human; they all must go to the big sleep one day. But a nation lives on. India will rise only when Dalit emancipation and economic empowerment has been fully achieved.

There are 7 Comments

The Gandhian movement needed to have its further, and most important extension, in a reconstructed educational system to replace the three level education set up by the British in order to supply an inexhaustible mercenary service which enabled their physical minority to rule over the vast sub-continent. Precisely because Nehru had received the best of all possible educations then available to the country, he ought to have personally militated for this reconstruction of the national education. With hindsight one is overwhelmed by disbelief that such a monumental neglect could have been so deeply entrenched in the body politic, in the mind of the population, that even till today the Indian elites have not brought forth a pedagogue of note. Renowned educators like Annie Besant, Madan Mohan Malviya, Rabindranath Tagore, had all passed away years before Independence, so that Nehru was fortunate in having no one to recall to him the monstrous lacuna in his vision of the government of the free India. Article 45 of the Constitution froze all attempts of modernising the education of the nation by the writers of the Constitution who chose to copy the system prevailing in the United States, and in Canada, where all the three levels of education are placed under the jurisdiction of the state (province), instead of the National Government, where such a practice, since the French Revolution, has been the norm in France till today. In France education is free from Grade I to the Ph.D. Even as a foreign student I paid only 50 francs as the charge for bureaucratic inscription necessary for my years of doctoral research at the Sorbonne, and that small amount included medical insurance and sports facilities. Before proceeding to France, I was paying 145 Rupees (= 145 Francs in the currency rate in 1960) for one semester fees at the Banaras Hindu University. Thanks to article 45 the 1950 Constitution has been the major impediment to a thorough reconstruction of the national education. I take some consolation in having strongly, urgently, proposed that the curricula in at least the two earlier levels of the educational system be such as to train the citizen to be BOTH a Brāhmaṇa and a Śūdra. The ideal culture of the ideal Brāhmaṇa was a unique one, geared to transfiguring social life into a way of life centred on the mystical self-fulment of the individual. Such a Brāhmaṇa is not necessarily one by birth, but as Yudhisthira tells his father, the Yakṣa Dharma,, by his conduct (ācāra). On such an appraisal of an individual's worth the Śūdra can be a Brāhmaṇa. The education ought further to train the citizen to be at the same time a Śūdra endowed with the ideal of service to all sentient beings. In my book THE LABYRITH OF SOLITUDE, in which I have exposed this idea, I have deliberately used the old terms Brahmaṇa and ̆Sūdra, without apologies. Nehru may have been perhaps too good for the benefits of his social intercourse with the Mountbattens. But with all his popularity he could not see that the absence of stellar educators like Tagore, Malviya and Annie Besant, was a huge cultural void in the Indian polity. In a culture which once placed Knowledge at the summit of its aspirations, it is indeed a great shame that elite colleges are still run by foreign missionaries, that so many semi-literate obscurantist noise-makers would rise above the masses to become CM here and CM there. If, in my book, I have endeavoured to propose one, certainly not the only indispensable one, way to prescribe the education for a nation riddled with castes, ranks, inequalities, of all sorts, in support and realisation of the clause guaranteeing civic equalitỵ. I am fully aware of my proposal being only a furious , but sterile, Quixotic charge against the broken windmill built by the Congress Party.

Very well analysed.

We give ouur personal information too Sony because we trust that they won't completely screw upp and put it in a place of vulnerability. And so, yes, that's pretty much what it means to me. Participants in the memorial insife the cburch can not stand in tears. My site: <a href="">game cheats xbox one</a>

Thanks a lot for sharing your cool web-site [url=]nba 2k coins[/url]

Wow because this is great job! Congrats and keep it up nba 2k17 coins

Sustain the remarkable work !! Lovin' it! cheap fifa 17 coins http://xn--h1acbhjeahnn7b.xn--p1ai/jeqsjiz-ywgym/ http://xn--80aej.xn--80aafclafk4aeydj1q.xn--p1ai/qolo-ffpynet-tgmrgoa-iagnnyo-jugyz-cpipypb-stfpq-e320173091-wyzvpkj-d58341-ozszax-lddqnye-nikvu/

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.