Agusta probe may go Bofors way

Agusta probe may go Bofors way

By Virendra Kapoor | 14 May, 2016
Experienced bribe-takers know how to cover the money trail.


Despite the Italian court convicting the bribe-givers in the Augusta-Westland deal there is hardly any progress at the Indian end to track down the bribe-takers. Yes, former Air Force chief S.P. Tyagi and his cousins got paid. But what they received was chicken-feed as compared to what the politicians, or their front men, received for placing the order for a dozen VVIP choppers for a total amount of Rs 3,600 crore. Ten per cent was earmarked for kickbacks.

Investigations by the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate are proceeding at a snail’s pace, and not necessarily because of any failure on their part. Though the Tyagis and the lawyer Gautam Khaitan have admitted receiving money from front companies set up by the middlemen in the deal, but both claim these were not bribes, but professional fees for the services rendered. Being a lawyer, Khaitan, belonging to the once-reputed Kolkata-centric law firm, O.P. Khaitan and Company, is unable to explain the web of shell companies he had set up to receive the tainted funds. In recent years, Khaitan had raised his work-profile in Dubai and in the neighbouring region. The former Air Force chief is hard put to justify investments in commercial properties.

Yet, the Tyagis and the Khaitans may not be of much interest to the current political establishment. In the absence of concrete evidence linking top Congress bosses to the payoffs, the latest corruption scandal too may peter out as a damp squib. Sources in the CBI-ED, however, do not rule out summoning the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Shashikant Sharma. Depending on the leads investigating agencies are able to get from the sustained grilling of Tyagi and Khaitan, the agency might consider summoning senior Congress leaders. But that decision would need political clearance and will have to be based on substantive evidence linking them to the payoffs. Of this, at least thus far there is no evidence.

Interestingly, everyone is cherry-picking from the interview Christian Michel, the Dubai-based wheeler-dealer, gave to a couple of Indian media outlets. His claim that he has no knowledge about Sonia Gandhi being paid is cited by Congress party to rubbish the Narendra Modi government’s claim about her involvement. On the other hand, the BJP has picked on Michel’s claim that a huge portion of the kickbacks flowed back to Italy to buttress the charge that Sonia Gandhi was involved, since her close relatives, including sister and mother live there.

When all is said and done, the fear is that Augusta Westland scam too might go the Bofors way. In both scams you know who the real bribe-takers are, but the investigators are unable to pin them down for want of actionable evidence. It is so because crooks are invariably a step or two ahead of the authorities, especially when they deal in an opaque web of shell companies floated in tax havens whose governments refuse to cooperate, a huge plus in their favour since the economies of these tiny nations/principalities are crucially dependent on the provision of top secret financial services.


The good news is that the PIL challenging the humongous increase in the publicity budget of the Delhi government from Rs 26 crore in the last year of Sheila Dikshit to Rs 526 crore in the first year of Arvind Kejriwal is being pulled out of cold storage. A two-member bench of the Delhi High Court, headed by Chief Justice G. Rohini, is set to take up the PIL soon. Maybe that is the reason there is respite from the full-page ads singing paeans to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and the AAP government. The obscene excess seems to have stirred the conscience of the people. How obscene can be gauged from the fact that the total spend of the Modi government on all forms of publicity in its first year was under Rs 1,000 crore, virtually the same as in the last year of the UPA. Whereas the self-avowedly Aam Aadmi government in Delhi, a union territory with less than 1% of the total population of the country, earmarked more than half of what the Modi government spent for all-India coverage.

Curiously, the Kejriwal government did not route the ads through any of the established agencies. It set up its own agency. Normally, advertising agencies operate on 10%-15% commission, with some reputed agencies going up to even 20% in special cases. There is no clarity as to who provides the ad agency services to the Kejriwal government and if the people involved are the same who had earlier worked for the party during its election campaign.

Meanwhile, given the huge publicity budget at its disposal, the Kejriwal government has hogged media attention, with owners of media outlets per force providing an inordinately disproportionate space and favourable coverage to the leaders of the government of the city-state. Taxpayers’ rupees are thus misused to build up the image of Kejriwal and his party. As a harassed Delhi babu commented during the failed but much tom-tommed odd-even phase two, had the Delhi government purchased 500 air-conditioned buses instead of wasting Rs 526 crore on self-glorification, the odd-even scheme may have made some dent in pollution levels. Indeed.

Incidentally, cynics have suggested that the AAP change its election symbol from broom (jhaadu) to loudspeaker (bhompu).


A group of Congressmen were seen carrying placards which had pictures of Priyanka, Robert Vadra and Sonia Gandhi. The slogan under the photos read: Vardar, Priyanka Lao, Congress Bachao. These placards were prominent at the so-called Save Democracy march the Congress leaders had organised from Jantar Mantar to Parliament Street police station, hardly a distance of 200 meters. But that is not the point why we mention the Vadra posters. The fact that Congress spokespersons on the evening news television shows were hard put to explain the placards seeking Vadra’s induction in the party, it would suggest that the top leadership had not sanctioned them. Since the man behind this show-stealer was a long-time buddy of Vadra, one Jagdish Sharma, the obvious question is whether Vadra is not amenable to the advice from his mother-in-law and Congress president Sonia Gandhi. It would seem so, especially from his recent remarks to a private news agency wherein he talked of plunging into politics and saving the Congress. Is a rebellion brewing in the First Family?


Civility and good sense have vanished from politics. And for this the Gandhis are to blame. The petty-mindedness resulted in their disapproving of any celebration of the birth anniversaries of late Prime Minister Narasimha Rao. So much so even Manmohan Singh, who owes his political career to the Rao, stopped showing up at Rao’s birth anniversary functions at the Andhra Bhawan, hardly a kilometre from the Prime Minister’s Office.

Now, it turns out, what to talk of the Gandhis, no senior leader of the Congress, especially from Punjab, cared to attend a recent event at the Rashtrapati Bhawan meant to mark the 100th birth anniversary of the late President Giani Zail Singh. President Pranab Mukherjee paid handsome tributes to the pragmatic Giani in the presence of a few members of his family and a number of his former aides.


There are 2 Comments

Indians remember PM PVNR for the reforms of 1991. What do they remember of Rajiv Gandhi's tenure for ?

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.